This is a thought and therefore it is to be taken solely as opinion on the author at the time of writing. I reserve to be wrong and alter this thought at any point in the future or the past.
It’s been a frequent conjecture in the red pill sphere that a woman’s ability to form a lasting pair bond is diminished with the number of sexual partners.
But that a man’s ability to pair bond is unaffected by his count of sexual partners.
Whether a double standard or a biological difference.
I can not say nor do I much care.
These are conjectures based on the summaries of my observations.
It is my current belief that women practice both pair bonding and peer bonding.
While men either practice peer bonding or pair bonding.
Peer bonding isn’t discussed when men talk about a women’s ability to pair bond.
It is without a doubt a foreign concept to most men.
Most men do not form new lasting friendships past the age of 25. And so the opportunity to create new and lasting peer bonds among men is diminished. So it is simply not thought about.
Women however can and do form lasting peer bonds throughout their life.
It is my current thought that men either practice peer bonding or pair bonding,
Whereas women can practice both at the same time.
The men who focus on peer bonding tend to put
“Bro’s before Hoes”
They tend to be the HVM (high value male), as their concerns for social status and allows them to climb the corporate ladder as well as become the “lifted” Alpha male of their friend circle.
But these men rarely settle down and if they do they often step out.
As their emotional needs (or need of sexual validation) tends to be more than a single partner can provide.
Where as I see the average Delta and Bravo,
Able to settle down but their pair bond takes priority over their social status.
As well as their economic status.
The drive to climb either ladder seems diminished
as long as things are well at home.
Here are my observations of women,
I have seen girls with high partner counts settle down into lasting marriages
A first I thought it was religion….
But whether Born Again Christian, Mormon, Wiccan, or Agnostic
religions where the package but the truth was
that these provide ready and open peer groups for the women
women who’ve taken up a regular social hobby with other women of “good” moral character
I see the same shift in them as well.
She can be the atheist or satanist in a knitting circle but the reinforcement of values through a stable peer group is the difference.
I think that women fill the first two levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs with a strong pair bond but only half of the third tier.
The other half of the third tier of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs as well as the fourth tier is reserved for influences beyond the home.
Whereas men for the most part seek to fill the part two tiers from society and the top two tiers from pair bonding. Men don’t need to peer bond with their coworkers or even hold to religious tenets and practices to satisfy the first two tiers and in most cases the Delta can rest content upon the third tier of Maslow’s hierarchy while filling the need for esteem through self isolating hobbies (video games, model trains, stamp collecting)
If you think I’m wrong about this FIGHT ME!
Thanks for reading, I hope this was of value.
I’ll be streaming from stage one develop to finished product a 4-player card game on twitch every Friday 3pm-5pm EST
or feel free @ me on Discord
Want more Ravenclaw over analysis
Send an E-mail to
Or Follow me on Twitter for retweets of cute Kirby pictures